Surveying the landscape of aging in post-postmodern America with compassion, wit and a liberal slant. Only intermittently mature.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Aging: The Conspiracy Theory

I've been observing some disturbing developments in myself at 62. ( I'm really sixty-one, but I've made it a practice since 33 to always give my age as one year older so I can get used to it. By this system, I'm about to turn 63.)  I'm growing increasingly alarmed to find strange new limitations of my brain.  I have no memory of agreeing to any of this.  It's as if there are entire missing decades between 33-year-old-me and me at however-old-I-am these days...could it be drug induced amnesia? Maybe it's just that I've been studying the Tea Party mindset too long (I'm working on publishing my conclusions in an article entitled, The Role of Senile and Paranoid Thought Processes In The Tea Party Movement); I begin to suspect there's something sinister at work.

 Given that my brain and body do whatever they want to these days regardless of my intentions, I hope I can keep this post in the road.  It feels like I'm no longer in charge, like I've been body-snatched by evil-doing poltergeists.  As evidence:

1)  I'm slow at everything I do.
2)  I'm impatient with time spent on things I don't want to do (which includes all maintenance of belongings and self.  I don't know if you've noticed, but those things take up most of our time at any age).
3)  I can't abide interruption and I'm distractible as hell.
4)  I can't find words...that tip-of-tongue problem based on word looking retrieval processes.
5)  I can't recall the proper sequence of steps in a task I've performed a million times before (ex: make a spaghetti dinner or get dressed).  I'll be on the last step and suddenly find I'd forgotten Step 3...which can be critical if it involves either olive oil or underwear.
6)  I get tired long before I'd expected to, which means I have trouble with biting off more than I can chew and with task completion.
7)  I can't seem to make decisions.

That's not an exhaustive list, but it'll do for now.  Something funny is going on here; I don't recognize any of those listed behaviors as me.  According to an article on aging and centenarians in Time Magazine, based on animal studies,"only about 30% of aging is genetically based;" which, considering that my overall competence seems to have dropped by at least 80%, leaves me with 40%, 60% some considerable percentage unaccounted for. They've ripped off my small supply of math skills, too. Time to do a little detective work.

First, on that infuriating word-retrieval glitch, apparently the density of the gray matter in the left insula of my brain has declined. It may have been redeposited on the inside of my thighs just above the knee; I KNOW I was really dense at one time and these knee-bulge thingies were NOT there yesterday.  I think my best defense against left insula theft is to learn a new word each day and to use that word frequently. On Wordsmith.org, today's word is cabal,  from the Hebrew kabalah, meaning a small, secret group of intriguers or plotters. In proper usage, My word retrieval issues can be blamed on an Idaho-based cabal of right-wing extremists who are bent on destroying the density of the left insulas of Liberal Elitist bloggers.  Good word to know.  Some of you could be next.


There's a surprising number of studies out there lately that try to put a positive spin on the brain changes I describe.  I'm increasingly suspicious of  this sort of thing; what motive could the cabal possibly have for making dodderism look good?  There are studies at Stanford  that show that, among the aged, our brain efficiency is improved by filtering out our "irrelevant" long-term memories so that we can put more mental energy toward the more immediately relevant short-term memories, or working memories, such as where we put the olive oil.  We don't even get to decide for ourselves what's relevant and what isn't, which is mind control. Maybe they do it through reality shows on the television.


Researchers have gone so far as to rob mice of full neuron development in their hippocampi, where long-term memory is stored, in an effort to improve their performance on maze-running tasks (similar to my spaghetti-dinner-making task). Guard your hippocampi, my fellow elders, and avoid cooking for crowds.  In fact, I'd recommend that, as soon as you get the kids out of the house, you stop cooking altogether.


Even AARP gets in on the conspiracy cover-up by pretending there's nothing going on.  In their article "Boost Your Brain Health," P. Murali Doraiswamy, M.D., claims that,
Despite what our youth-oriented culture tells us, mental decline after 50 is not a given. In fact, in some ways the healthy brain gets stronger with age. Studies confirm that accumulated knowledge and expert skills (a.k.a. wisdom) increase as you get older...Other brain functions may not improve with age, but they don't automatically wane either. One example is higher-order decision making such as choosing the best investments. Older people do as well as younger ones on tests that measure this function—as long as they aren't rushed.
Oh, yeah. A bunch of us must have been a little rushed between the tech bubble of the nineties and the beginning of the Great Recession when we were trying to decide where to safely invest our retirement savings...real estate, mutual funds, hmmm. After basically saying that most healthy brains experience few problems with aging other than some short-term memory loss, Dr. Duraiswamy goes on to devote an entire article to recommendations for improving brain functioning in the elderly.  Well, which is it?  Are we all losing it or just those of us who happened to be in the right place at the wrong time when the spaceship landed looking for experimental subjects?


Where was I?  On that distractibility issue, I am self-diagnosed with A-RADD (Age-Related Attention Deficit Disorder), but, according to my sure-fire spaghetti-sauce diagnostic tool, this problem came on very suddenly at age 61, 60 recently, while aging is supposed to take place over time, right?  I promise you that no time at all has passed since the last time I had a clue what the hell I was doing.  Adam Gazzelley of UCSF has studied this problem and finds that "not all older adults are impaired relative to younger adults."  (I bet Adam is about 28; Adam was a very popular name for baby boys in 1982). Adam's team cabal studied two groups, one aged 19-33 and the other, aged 60-72. 
The researchers used electroencephalography to record electrical signals from the participants’ brains in milliseconds during the task. In contrast to the younger adults, the older group could not suppress distracting stimuli during the first 200 milliseconds after exposure. “At later time points, the ability to ignore does show up,” Gazzaley says. “It’s not abolished, just delayed.” By then, however, the irrelevant information had interfered with the memory task, making the older group less accurate overall than the younger group.
I think they're saying that my A-RADD developed suddenly at age 60, which is about when I woke up to find myself instantaneously old and prone to parenthetical digression (that was when all my slacks stopped fitting me, too), and that I should ignore the first 200 milliseconds of any task I take on.  I'm going to ignore Adam's research; I don't know how it got in here.

It's not funny.  There's even research to show that our sense of humor is being effed with!  From the Journal of The International Neuropsychological Society, I learn this:
In research designed to probe humour comprehension and appreciation, Shammi and Stuss found that while older people were just as capable as younger people of "getting" wordplay jokes, they were not as good at recognising funny cartoons, or identifying funny punch lines to jokes.
The punch line to that joke is that these guys were named Shammi and Stuss.  Obviously, I've not lost a tittle of my humor comprehension.  As for funny cartoons...


 I was beginning to tire of all this research after about fifteen minutes, so I decided to drop the item-by-item schema and look for some large, over-arching theory to explain my whole list of complaints.  That's when I learned of the Dark Energy in my brain, as covered by the March 2010 issue of Scientific American. Basically, they've discovered through modern imaging studies that our brains actually use more energy in the background of our minds when our attention is turned off, when we're daydreaming or sleeping, than it does when we're paying attention.  When we're focused on something, the brain actually slows down.  They call this background hum the brain's Default Mode, and, when the connections in the Dark Matter become faulty with disease processes or aging, there's less efficiency altogether. That all sounds sort of Black Ops-y to me, like somebody's hacked into my meat computer and fiddled with my Default Mode.

I can't find that issue of Scientific American.  It's here somewhere, I know. I even highlighted the kerfluey out of it to share with you. I have absolutely no idea where it went, unless a shadowy cabal is involved. Is it age?  Is it me?  Is it a vast Right Wing Conspiracy headed by Newt Gingrich and Dick Cheney designed to turn aging voters into mindless lemmings? They made off with my highlighter, too.



[images: www.textually.org/.../images/set3/spy-vs-spy.jpg, jaggedsmile.files.wordpress.com/.../mindtrip.jpg, scienceblogs.com/twominds/sign_brain.jpg,www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/ ]

11 comments:

  1. Love this and am sharing with my supervisor; though years apart in age (you and my supervisor), I feel sure she will appreciate this post...and know she can relate.

    I'm filing these away, incidentally, so that I can benefit from your experience. I only hope I remember where I put it ;-).
    ReplyDelete
  2. Aging is an interesting process. My plan is to stay active, both in mind and body, and hope for the best.
    ReplyDelete
  3. vervezest-2009@att.netMar 2, 2010 06:04 PM
    Could it possibly be that your research is describing the onset of dementia? Scares the hell out of me.

    ps. It's only taken 3 times to type in that word verification - still counting. Wingnut.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Nance,

    It's been a tough two weeks for me at work, and I've laughed more in the last three minutes reading your post than in those two weeks combined. Many thanks!

    My favorites?

    I'll be on the last step and suddenly find I'd forgotten Step 3...which can be critical if it involves either olive oil or underwear.

    (I bet Adam is about 28; Adam was a very popular name for baby boys in 1982). Adam's cabal studied two groups, one aged 19-33 and the other, aged 60-72.

    Priceless. Keep it up, please.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Nance, you have some of the most well researched, witty blog posts ever. You have nothing to worry about on sharp as a tack front!
    And God knows, I can't remember what I did yesterday!
    ReplyDelete
  6. You may be right about the loss of memory and the ability to recall just the right word, but I assure you that your wit and humor are fully intact. You've made me laugh out loud and like Jack, I am particularly fond of the forgotten olive oil or underwear dilemma. Oh, and thank you for identifying A-RADD; I'm pretty certain that I also suffer from it.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Great post! I'm 69, or 70 by your method; either way, it doesn't get better, but you do get used to it. Truth is, who needs memory when there is Google? And I feel that I'm brighter at this age than when I was 29. There are limitations but overall, I am brighter. Plus, if you look back in history, the 'elders' were always considered to be the wise one.
    ReplyDelete
  8. I'll have more to say later on your richly informative essay, assuming of course I remember to, which suggests I should comment in some way right now, maybe not even letting punctuation intrude, so let me just say that if knee-bulge thingies figure with some, the sudden coming-into-being of what could be called a withering in the thighs of some men, absolutely not there yesterday but there today is worthy of note, plus not having read them, I still know I like the Stanford studies, studies that would seem to offer science-based support for Norman Mailer's contention that his brain in old age had come to resemble a swiss cheese, the superfluous parts replaced by holes, leaving only the good stuff.
    ReplyDelete
  9. I just don't have the energy I used to...and this impacts everything I do. I'm well after checking with my doctor. I think after 50 the I don't give a sh** factor kicks in. I still love life but my edge is gooonnnne
    ReplyDelete
  10. I had several absolutely brilliant thoughts while reading this (as usual) hysterical and verifiable and apt post.... but the cabal has been here, too, and they are gone.

    Perhaps they are hiding with your Scientific American article?
    ReplyDelete
  11. Okay I really got a huge chuckle out of this and yet I sense theres something serious hidden, hence the title. Wait until artificial intelligence is pitted against us wise elders. Watson will have us wondering why try to remember.His performance on Jeopardy in February was flashy and swift.
    ReplyDelete

Lurking allowed. Commenting adored.